Loading…
Loading...
Loading...
Loading…
Key Stage 3 · Marking rubrics
Three years × four strands × four levels. Each cell is the descriptor a marker reads when awarding the level. Skill-code chips link back to the master skills list.
As per school policy students should receive What Went Well (WWW) and Even Better If (EBI) feedback every 8 lessons - in English that means once every two weeks. Feedback is constructive and based on outcomes recently covered in class.
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Identifies simple ideas. Limited evidence. Basic or unclear comments. | Shows some understanding. Uses some evidence. Begins to comment on language. | Explains ideas clearly using relevant evidence. Makes supported inferences. Explains effects. | Interprets meaning confidently. Selects precise evidence. Explains how and why methods shape meaning. Makes connections. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Writes simple ideas with limited structure. Little control. | Some structure and paragraphing. Ideas partly developed. Some control. | Clear paragraphs. Developed ideas. Writes for purpose with some control of viewpoint. | Well-crafted, controlled writing. Shapes meaning through vocabulary, tone, and viewpoint. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Frequent errors. Limited control of punctuation and spelling. | Some accuracy. Attempts control of sentences and punctuation. | Mostly accurate punctuation and spelling. Some deliberate choices. | Accurate and controlled. Edits effectively. Adapts language for purpose and audience. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Shares simple ideas with limited clarity. | Responds to others. Some clarity in ideas. | Clear ideas. Uses evidence. Responds appropriately. | Justifies ideas with evidence. Builds and challenges ideas. Structured, confident delivery. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Identifies basic meaning. Quotations are loose or paraphrased. | Explains meaning. Uses embedded quotations sometimes. Single inferences with brief explanation. | Embeds quotations confidently. Explains effects with "this suggests… because…". Compares texts. | Develops multiple interpretations. Uses precise terminology. Sustained comparison across texts. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Some structure but ideas under-developed. | Coherent paragraphs. Ideas developed with detail. Beginning to make deliberate choices. | Logically organised writing. Deliberate sentence and structural choices. Tone matches purpose. | Sustained craft. Imagery, perspective and structure shape reader experience deliberately. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Errors disrupt meaning. Inconsistent register. | Mostly accurate punctuation. Distinguishes formal from informal in places. | Accurate punctuation and spelling. Adapts vocabulary and syntax for audience. | Secure register control. Self-edits to refine effectiveness. Wide vocabulary deployed precisely. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Speaks briefly. Limited contribution to discussion. | Speaks clearly. Some building on others’ contributions. | Confident speaker. Builds on others. Presents ideas in structured way. | Sustained, organised analytical talk. Develops and challenges peers with evidence. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Some understanding. Single, surface-level inferences. | Multiple inferences attempted. Quotations mostly embedded. One method analysed at a time. | Sustained conceptual argument. Fluent integrated quotations. Multiple methods analysed together. Evaluative voice. | Original conceptual reading. Judicious selection. Comparative or contextual framing. Sophisticated terminology. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Paragraphs present but not cohesive across whole text. | Cohesive structure emerging. Ideas developed critically. Sentence variation present. | Cohesive whole-text structure. Critical depth. Crafted tone and imagery. Sustained control. | Confident manipulation of voice and structure. Tone and imagery deliberately shape reader response. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Errors limit precision. Register slips. | Wide punctuation used accurately. Register controlled. | Punctuation used deliberately for effect. Vocabulary precise. Edits critically. | Sophisticated syntactic manipulation. Independent critical editing. Deliberate stylistic choices. |
| Below target | Working towards | Expected | Greater depth |
|---|---|---|---|
Speaks audibly. Contributions descriptive rather than analytical. | Develops own ideas with evidence. Contributes to discussion. | Develops AND challenges peer ideas. Fluent across contexts. Structured analytical register. | Sustained sophisticated debate. Critical challenge with precise terminology. Presents ideas memorably. |